Q: 20
An administrator would like to plan for new project-related growth.
New project workload requirements have been included for a cluster named ClusterXYZ:
· 2 Medium Sized SQL Servers
· 10 VMs with 16Gb RAM, 4 vCPU, 100GB Storage
Which two additional information items should be added to the capacity planning scenario to
provide a proper capacity runway expectation? (Choose two.)
Options
Discussion
A and B make sense here. You need storage compression ratios to estimate actual usable capacity, and the dates for workload rollout are key to runway planning. C's a common trap since cluster specs are already factored in as baseline. If I'm off let me know.
C , since knowing the current cluster hardware specs helps predict real capacity runway. Official guide and practice exams push that kind of detail too. Maybe I’m missing something, but option A feels less immediate here. Agree?
C/D? Both could be relevant, because cluster hardware specs and change in demand seem important for forecasting capacity.
Not sure about C or D honestly. For capacity runway, the traps are thinking you need cluster specs (C), but that's usually baseline info. It's A and B here since compression and workload timing actually change future estimates. Lots of similar trick wording on these Nutanix questions.
Not seeing it for C or D here. For true capacity runway on Nutanix clusters, you really need to know both the storage compression ratio (A) and when the workloads hit the cluster (B). Hardware specs are already known for ClusterXYZ, and demand percentage is less precise. Trap seems to be C since it isn't 'additional' info in this context.
Option A and B. If the timing of when workloads get added changes, would that influence the best picks here?
Be respectful. No spam.
