Q: 14
How should an organization include third-party suppliers in the continual improvement of services?
Options
Discussion
C/D? Both sort of force improvement, but not sure either nails "inclusion" the way the question wants.
Quick check: does the question mean "should" as in what's required by policy, or just what would be best practice? If it's about enforceable requirements, A makes the most sense since contracts are binding, but if it's more informal, maybe D could fit?
A for sure. Making third-party improvement part of the contract makes it enforceable, not just a suggestion. Other options are too specific or not guaranteed. Pretty much standard ITIL practice, unless someone sees a catch?
A only if the contract actually spells out the improvement responsibilities-otherwise, suppliers can just ignore it. Some exam versions trip you up if "details" aren't literally in the agreement. Anyone see different wording elsewhere?
Seen this covered in the official ITIL guide and sample exams, A is correct.
A is wrong, B. The others focus too much on process but option A actually makes improvement part of the contract, which is more enforceable. The others feel like traps since they don't include obligations.
A imo. You want third-party improvement baked into the contract or it's just wishful thinking. Pretty sure that's what ITIL expects here.
Be respectful. No spam.