HOTSPOT - You have an Azure subscription named Subscription1 that contains the users shown in the following table. 



NO NO NO
NO
NO
HOTSPOT - You have an Azure subscription named Subscription1 that contains the users shown in the following table. 



NO NO NO
Official docs and some practice tests always call out RDP properties for quick fixes like this. So pretty confident it's A here. Just change clipboard/drive redirection on HostPool1, no Intune config needed.
HOTSPOT You have an Azure Virtual Desktop deployment that contains the resources shown in the following table. 

FSLogix profile containers: Recovery1 only
Data disks: Backup1 only
That's because FSLogix profiles use Azure File Share, which can only be backed up to a Recovery Services vault (and it has to be in the same region). For data disks, you need an Azure Backup vault in West US so Backup1 fits. Pretty sure that's spot on here, but let me know if I'm missing anything.
HOTSPOT Which users can create Pool4, and which users can join session hosts to the domain? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Is it possible Operator2 could join hosts if the environment hasn't removed default Account Operators rights? Or does the question assume strict RBAC like most exam scenarios where only Domain Admin (Operator1) is allowed? Curious how strict we should be interpreting this.
Admin2 only for Pool4 since that's the only one with both VM Contributor and Desktop Virtualization Contributor. Domain join is Operator1 only, because Account Operators' rights are usually restricted in secure setups. Pretty sure that's what MS wants for this scenario, but open to counterpoints.
DRAG DROP You need to evaluate the RDS deployment in the Seattle office. The solution must meet the technical requirements. Which three actions should you perform in sequence? To answer, move the appropriate actions from the list of actions to the answer area and arrange them in the correct order.
Create a project in Azure Migrate → Register Lakeside tool → Install agents on Pool2 VMs. This order matches the migration assessment process for RDS and fits the scenario since Pool2 is the specified group to evaluate. Pretty sure that's what Microsoft expects here, but chime in if you see it different.
HOTSPOT - You create an Azure Virtual Desktop host pool as shown in the following exhibit. 
Nice one, this matches what I’ve seen in exam dumps. Session hosts need the WebRTC Redirector Service for Teams redirection, and hardware encoding gets enabled on client devices by editing the registry. So it’s:
Session hosts: Install the Remote Desktop WebRTC Redirector Service.
Client devices: Set the UseHardwareEncoding registry key to 1.
Pretty sure that’s right, but open to correction!
Yeah, so for max concurrent sessions you multiply 5 VMs by the max limit of 10 per VM, which gives you 50 total. The depth-first load balancing means new sessions will stack up on the same host until it hits its cap before moving to the next. Pretty sure that's what they're going for here, but correct me if I'm off.
Yep, this is depth-first in action. Max sessions is 50 since it's 5 hosts times 10 sessions each, and for the session placement, depth-first always fills up one VM before touching another. So first new logins go to the same session host until it's full. If someone disagrees let me know, but feels solid.
Seen similar setups in the official guide and practice tests: session hosts should get the WebRTC Redirector Service, while on client devices you enable hardware encoding via the UseHardwareEncoding registry key. Feels correct but let me know if there's a nuance I'm missing.
DRAG DROP You have an Azure Virtual Desktop deployment. You plan to create a new host pool that meets the following requirements: • Supports up to 25 user connections • Contains 10 Windows 11 multi-session hosts • Evenly distributes user sessions across the session hosts You need to recommend which type of host pool and load-balancing algorithm to use. What should you recommend? To answer, drag the appropriate options to the correct targets. Each option may be used once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to drag the split bar between panes or scroll to view content. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Yeah, for multi-session Windows hosts and even session distribution, "Pooled" is the only real fit for mode, and "Breadth-first" is what spreads users out across all VMs. "Depth-first" would stack users on one VM before filling the next, which isn't what they're asking. Pretty sure this is the right mapping but happy to hear other takes.
Pooled mode → Breadth-first. Pooled is required for Windows 11 multi-session and Breadth-first will actually spread those 25 connections across the 10 hosts so no single VM gets overloaded. Pretty sure that's what the question is looking for.
Pooled for host pool mode, Breadth-first for load-balancing. Breadth-first spreads users evenly across hosts, which fits the "even distribution" ask here. Pooled is required for multi-session anyway. Pretty sure that's right but let me know if anyone disagrees.
Pooled for Host pool mode, Breadth-first for load-balancing. Had something like this in a mock, and Breadth-first always comes up for "evenly distribute" user sessions. Personal wouldn't support multi-session anyway. Confident this lines up with what the question wants but open if anyone thinks otherwise.
HOTSPOT You need to create a Conditional Access policy to meet the security require-ments. How should you configure the policy? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
Authentication context, Client apps, and Require token protections for sign-in sessions (preview) is the combo here. The key is targeting sensitive actions with authentication context, not just blanketing all access. Pretty sure that's what MS is going for with these Conditional Access questions. If anyone thinks Resources would fit better let me know!
Does the question actually mention securing just sensitive actions or specific app functions? Curious if it's about targeted controls, then authentication context makes sense to me. Or is it about broad app coverage? That'd push toward Resources instead. Anyone else read a clue pointing one way?
Authentication context, Client apps, Require token protections is what you want. Some might pick "Resources (formerly cloud apps)" but that's too broad here. Policy needs to be scoped to sensitive actions for better control. Went over a very similar setup in MS Learn labs, pretty sure this is right unless they change preview features.
You have an Azure Virtual Desktop deployment that contains the host pools shown in the following table. 
D imo because Azure Site Recovery is built for exactly this, letting you replicate across regions with minimal manual work. B looks tempting but actually means running or at least maintaining two sets of host pools, so it adds to both cost and admin effort long term. Seen similar in exam prep and ASR is what they want when the question highlights minimizing overhead. Could see someone picking B if they gloss over the DR requirements though.