Q: 10
You have an Azure Virtual Desktop deployment that contains the host pools shown in the following table. 
You need to create a disaster recovery environment in the West US region. The solution must minimize costs and administrative effort. What should you do?
Options
Discussion
Generate a signing certificate, create MSIX package, create MSIX image, upload image to Share1. Official guide covers this process.
Yeah that's the right order: signing cert first, then MSIX package, then image, finally upload image to Share1.
Generate a signing certificate, create an MSIX package, create an MSIX image, upload the MSIX image to Share1.
Option D (ASR) here. B is tempting but you'd pay more and manual config is a pain.
D imo because Azure Site Recovery is built for exactly this, letting you replicate across regions with minimal manual work. B looks tempting but actually means running or at least maintaining two sets of host pools, so it adds to both cost and admin effort long term. Seen similar in exam prep and ASR is what they want when the question highlights minimizing overhead. Could see someone picking B if they gloss over the DR requirements though.
D
Yeah, D seems right since Azure Site Recovery lets you handle DR without spinning up extra host pools, so less admin and lower costs. If the focus was on no downtime, maybe B, but here it's about efficiency. Agree?
B tbh, since creating two new host pools in West US puts everything fresh there, which avoids replication lag issues some orgs have run into according to similar practice questions. Not as automated maybe, but less room for snapshot problems. Maybe not the lowest admin overhead though. Someone disagree?
Yeah, D makes the most sense. Azure Site Recovery covers DR without having to pre-build or run extra host pools (B would cost more). ASR keeps costs down and it's less work to manage, pretty sure that's what they're after.
C/D? B sounds like a trap here since keeping extra host pools running in West US isn't cost effective, plus that's more to manage. D uses Azure Site Recovery which is designed for low-cost DR and keeps admin light. Pretty sure that's what they're looking for, though I can see why B might tempt some if you miss the minimize cost/admin piece.
Be respectful. No spam.