Q: 11
When placed early in a search, which command is most effective at reducing search execution time?
Options
Discussion
Option A not C. Sorting doesn't reduce event count, dedup drops duplicates so it's faster early.
A every time, dedup trims events early and speeds things up. Sorting can actually slow it down if used first.
C or D? Saw something like this on a practice exam and picked C, not totally sure though.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 12
Which statement is true about Splunk alerts?
Options
Discussion
A or D? If it's real-time only then D fits, but since alerts can also be scheduled, A is probably safer. Disagree?
B makes sense here since alerts are based on searches, but pretty sure the trick is it says they ONLY send email. Think that's the trap since Splunk can trigger other actions too. Someone correct me if I'm off.
A imo. Alerts in Splunk can be scheduled or set to run in real time, it's not limited to just one method. Saw a similar question in practice dumps. Let me know if anyone disagrees.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 13
All users by default have WRITE permission to ALL knowledge objects.
Options
Discussion
No way, that's false. Default roles don't give everyone write access to all knowledge objects.
False, normal users can't write to all knowledge objects unless their role allows it.
Wouldn't it be True though? I thought standard users can write to lots of objects unless their role is really locked down. Maybe the trap here is around shared vs private objects?
True imo, since standard users can usually make changes to lots of objects unless restricted, so feels like a trick. Trap is not all permissions are default.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 14
How many minutes, by default, is the time to live (ttl) for an ad-hoc search job?
Options
Discussion
Probably C here. Splunk's defaultsavettl is set to 600 seconds (which is 10 minutes) for ad-hoc searches. I’m pretty sure about this from lab experience, but let me know if you’ve seen a different default anywhere.
Think this one is C. Almost every official guide and practice test points to ad-hoc search TTL being 10 minutes by default.
C , Splunk keeps ad-hoc search jobs for 10 minutes by default. defaultsavettl in limits.conf is set to 600 seconds. Seen similar in practice tests, but open if anyone has seen it different.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 15
Which of the following is the best description of Splunk Apps?
Options
Discussion
Option B
Wow, the wording on these Splunk questions gets me every time. B
B
B
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 16
Which search matches the events containing the terms "error" and "fail"?
Options
Discussion
A or B, not totally sure. But I think A because in Splunk searches, space acts like AND so both words have to be there. B would pull either one, right? Can someone confirm?
I don’t think it’s A. B. The OR operator should match both terms in the results, since either "error" or "fail" could be present in an event. Maybe missing something?
For SPL basics, I'd check the official Splunk docs and maybe try this in the hands-on lab too. Seems pretty common on practice sets, so worth running a few test searches if you're not sure.
Option A looks right to me. In SPL, just putting words with a space means AND, so both "error" and "fail" must appear. B is tricky but OR would return events with either term, not both. Pretty sure it’s A unless I’m missing something.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 17
Splunk automatically determines the source type for major data types.
Options
Discussion
True Splunk does a good job detecting common sourcetypes out of the box for major log formats like syslog or Apache. Clear question too.
True
True imo, but watch out for the trap since Splunk might not auto-detect rare formats.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 18
What is the correct syntax to count the number of events containing a vendor_action field?
Options
Discussion
Option C
Its B. I think count stats (vendor_action) is how I did it before in Splunk, maybe a syntax trick here.
Seriously, Splunk's syntax trips up so many on these! It's C for sure. Gotta remember it's
stats count(fieldname), not the other way around. The function always comes first in SPL stats. If the field exists in the event, it'll get counted. Pretty confident but open to pushback if anyone's seen otherwise.Probably C here
Nah, pretty sure it's B. That's the syntax I've used in some older dashboards to pull counts for fields like vendor_action.
C tbh, had something similar in a mock test and that's what worked.
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 19
Field names are case sensitive and field value are not.
Options
Discussion
Just to clarify, do they mention any special search functions like case() here or is it just about regular SPL behavior?
Guessing True. Field names like
host and Host are treated differently in SPL, so that's case sensitive. Field values usually aren't unless you force it in your search. This lines up with the official docs and practice tests.Yeah, that's True. Field names care about case in SPL, values usually don't.
Feels like False. I remember field values can be case sensitive depending on the search, so the statement is kind of a trap. Field names are always case sensitive but values aren’t always treated the same. Anyone else see it like this?
Call it True. Had something like this in a mock last week. In Splunk, field names are definitely case sensitive-that trips people up sometimes. Field values aren’t by default (unless you use specific commands). Agree?
Be respectful. No spam.
Q: 20
Will the queries following below get the same result?
1. index=log sourcetype=error_log status !=100
2. index=log sourcetype=error_log NOT status =100
Options
Discussion
Nah, I don’t think it’s A. B is correct here since != drops events with no status field but NOT status=100 keeps them. Easy trap if you miss the missing field case.
Its B. The != operator ignores events without a status field but NOT status=100 will include them, so results don't always match. Seen folks miss this detail on practice exams, be careful with field existence logic.
Probably B. Main thing is that
!= ignores events where the field is missing, but NOT field=val includes them. Easy to miss if you don't think about null fields. Trap for A here.Had something like this in a mock, pretty sure it's B.
B
Seen similar logic questions in practice sets, and the official docs are useful for stuff like this. Good idea to review SPL query behavior, especially how NOT and != work.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 11 of 20 · Page 2 / 2