Nice, straightforward scenario. A is the right move here, since a Text Widget lets you add commentary or explanations directly on the dashboard, which helps with storytelling and emphasis. I've seen similar logic in practice exams. Anyone disagree?
I was thinking B (Record-Triggered Flows with Business Hours) because you could use flows to stamp timestamps each time ownership changes and calculate durations. That way admins could build a report based on team assignment history. Not 100% sure if it's as native or detailed as D, but it seems doable for tracking time per team. Agree?
Yeah B matches what Salesforce expects, since dynamic dashboards automatically adjust the data to the current user's permissions. Filters (A) help a bit, but don’t change what data each user can see based on their own access. Pretty sure B is right here, but happy if someone sees it differently.
Kanban totally fits here because it's both visual and lets you drag opportunities across stages in real time. Reports or dashboards just show the data, they don't let you actually move deals ahead in the process. I remember similar wording coming up before so pretty confident on this one, but open to other thoughts if I missed something.
- Kanban view = pipeline visibility + drag-and-drop progress updates
Create a list view filtered to next 90 days, then recommend users use Kanban mode to drag-and-drop updates. That way, sales can both see and quickly update opps in one spot. Pretty sure this is what Salesforce wants here, unless I'm missing some twist.
I picked B here since dashboards give a visual overview and managers often want that. But now thinking about it, dashboards don't let users directly edit records inline-it's just views. The official guide leans hard on list views plus Kanban for editable pipelines. If you want to double check, practice with the Sales Cloud labs helps clarify the difference.
I'd go with A since troubleshooting as a system admin makes sense, but maybe missing that it won't match the exact user's permissions. Not 100% if user-specific errors would always show up for the admin though. Agree?
A is wrong, B. If the question said "best long-term fix" instead of "most likely cause", would C make more sense?
Yeah, B makes sense here. Component Visibility can target users based on permission sets, which fits since both teams have the same profile but different perms. Page Layouts would hit both groups if they share a profile, so that's not it. Unless there's some edge case, pretty sure B is the way to go. Anyone see a scenario where C or D would work better?