You need to reduce the number of Azure consumption API calls for User2. Which markup segment should you use? A) 


Q: 1
Options
Discussion
Option C, saw a similar question on a practice set, it matches the user-specific caching requirement.
C . B looks close but that's a common trap, since it would affect all users not just User2.
What if User2's role changes, would that still keep C as the best pick?
B makes sense to me since caching reduces the API calls, but it's not scoped just to User2. I thought B would still help because any repeated requests from User2 would hit the cache. I'm not 100 percent, maybe missing something about targeting only one user. Anyone see a downside with B?
For me, C here. B looks tempting but it seems to apply caching too broadly. C specifically checks User2 so that's closer to what the question is asking (reduce calls for one user).
C imo, saw this on a recent practice exam and the user-specific caching was the key detail.
Yeah, C fits the user-specific caching they want for User2. The others look more global or don’t target just that user. Not 100% but all signs point to C.
C makes sense since it's the only option that actually checks for User2 specifically. B is tempting but that'd cache for everyone, not just the user in the question. Pretty sure C is right for user-level API call reduction, but happy to hear if I'm missing anything.
C I remember a similar scenario from labs where user-specific caching did exactly this.
A isn’t it, has to be C since only that one targets User2 specifically.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 1 of 35
