Q: 14
Your organization has three main locations with 30.000 hosts in each location. You are planning to
deploy Netskope using iPsec tunnels for security.
What are two considerations to make a successful connection in this scenario? (Choose two.)
Options
Discussion
Definitely has to be C and D here. With 30k hosts per site, you're gonna need to consider tunnel load and redundancy-browser or OS type doesn't really flip the answer unless it was about endpoint support.
Feels like C and D
These Netskope exam questions always spin in circles, it's C and D.
Had something like this in a mock. Pretty sure C and D are right since you need to plan for enough capacity (host count) and have redundancy with multiple POPs. Don't think browsers or OS come into play for IPsec tunnel sizing. Anyone disagree?
B tbh, OS compatibility can mess with IPsec tunnels so I'd pick B and D.
C/D tbh, tunnel capacity and redundant POPs are what you need for big envs like this.
C and D tbh. Option B is tempting but it's a trap for tunnel planning on this scale.
I don’t think B is right here, even though OS can matter. The question is about making the IPsec tunnels work reliably at scale, so C (redundant POPs) and D (number of hosts) are what really count. OS/browser come into play more for client-side app issues. Agree?
D imo, you gotta consider number of hosts and redundant POPs for large scale. C and D.
B and D. OS compatibility can cause headaches in big rollouts especially with IPsec client configs, plus you always have to plan for the number of hosts scaling.
Be respectful. No spam.
