Q: 11
You use Netskope to provide a default Malware Scan profile for use with your malware policies. Also,
you want to create a custom malware detection profile.
In this scenario, what are two additional requirements to complete this task? (Choose two.)
Options
Discussion
Not sure why C isn't right here. Option B and C.
D imo, but is the focus on 'default' or 'custom' profile requirements? That would totally change which two I pick.
Option B and C. The question asks for additional requirements, so remediation or quarantine profiles sound needed when customizing detection.
I see why a lot of folks think B or C, but I keep coming back to A and D. The profile setup part asks for hash lists, not remediation stuff. I think that's the trick here. Disagree?
You've got to add both a custom hash allowlist (A) and a blocklist (D) when making your own malware detection profile in Netskope. It lets you tune false positives and make sure known threats get blocked. Pretty sure remediation and quarantine are handled elsewhere, not as core detection profile steps. Anyone see it different?
A and D here. Custom detection profile setup in Netskope always needs hash lists for allow/deny, not remediation or quarantine profiles, those are separate steps. Pretty sure that's what the question is aiming at, but let me know if you disagree.
A and D tbh, C trips people up but remediation isn’t required to build the profile itself.
Probably A and D here, since creating a custom malware detection profile is all about adding custom hash allowlist and blocklist. Remediation or quarantine steps come afterwards, not at this setup stage. Pretty sure this lines up with Netskope docs but open if anyone disagrees.
Isn’t B a common distractor here? You really just need the hash allowlist and blocklist for custom profiles, not remediation steps.
No doubt here, A and D are the two you need for a custom malware detection profile setup.
Be respectful. No spam.