This comes down to what "most effective" really means here. D is right since BCM's Cluster Extension actually automates spinning up AWS nodes only when you hit the local limit, so it saves time and manual effort compared to option B. But if you had some advanced compliance or network config that BCM automation can't handle, B could technically be safer in rare cases. For most setups though, I'm pretty sure D is what they want.
Call it it's D since BCM's Cluster Extension actually automates the provisioning of AWS nodes when local capacity maxes out. Manual options like B work but aren't the most effective for seamless cloudbursting. Open to other views if anyone’s seen different on practice exams.
D imo, Cluster Extension is built for this. Options B and C both want you to do manual work which defeats the point of cloudbursting. A is a distractor, since BCM's load balancer alone can't handle auto-provisioning into AWS. Seen similar in practice questions, so pretty sure D is right.
I saw a similar question on a practice test, and I was debating between B and D. Isn’t manually provisioning in AWS (B) more reliable if you want tighter control? BCM’s automation sounds good but can be unpredictable sometimes, right?
