Option D makes the most sense since "bridge0" is usually what you'll see in options when br0 isn't listed. The CVM connects to the host with that default bridge, even if under the hood it's technically br0. A little confusing with naming, but pretty sure D is what they want here. If anyone's seen different on recent Nutanix AHV builds, let me know.
Is it really the Health dashboard for log collection? I thought it might be under Settings. Can anyone double-check?
I don’t think it’s A. Wouldn’t C take priority if you’ve got a policy on a category that an entity belongs to? That’s usually more targeted than just the entity type.
Had something like this in a mock. Most specific policy wins, so that's A. If the policy is set directly on the entity it overrides broader configs every time. Pretty sure that's how Nutanix does precedence here but correct me if you've seen it done differently.
Man, Nutanix loves their product names. But it’s gotta be B-NC2 is the only one they advertise for lifting on-prem clusters into AWS/Azure. Rest are either security or data tools, not hybrid cloud solutions.
Pretty sure it's B since Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) actually lets you bridge on-prem with AWS/Azure. The other options don't handle extending your datacenter like that. Correct me if I'm missing something though.
Yeah, it's A. Even with RF3, LCM does upgrades one node at a time for safety. You can technically survive more failures, but having only one node in maintenance keeps things smooth and minimizes risk. Let me know if someone saw this behave differently.
C or D? If the question asked for guest OS access vs ESXi datastore, would that change which protocol Nutanix supports?