Q: 9
Your company uses Teams.
Users often use Teams mobile apps to make and receive calls.
You change the display name for a user named User1.
User! reports that their previous name still appears when they receive incoming calls in the Teams
mobile app.
You need to ensure that the updated display name for User1 appears.
What should you do?
Options
Discussion
Option D
C or D? I remember supervision policies have monitoring features, so I thought C could fit if you want to track cross-department invites. Not 100 percent positive it blocks them though, so maybe that's a stretch. Anyone else think C is valid here?
D . Supervision (C) is tempting but doesn't block, just monitors. Info barriers actually prevent the cross-invite. Disagree?
If users need to be actually prevented from inviting others across departments, wouldn't that be information barrier policies instead of supervision? Supervision just tracks, but doesn't block actions as far as I remember.
Its D here, not C. Info barrier policies actually stop users from different departments inviting each other, where supervision just monitors. Saw this on a similar practice exam. Easy to get tripped up by C though.
I don’t think it’s D, I’d pick C here. Supervision policies give you oversight on user actions like invites, which sounds like what’s needed. Maybe info barriers are more restrictive but for just monitoring, C seems right to me.
Not C, it's D. Info barrier policies are designed for exactly this, while supervision just looks at comms. Some people mix them up.
C tbh, since supervision covers monitoring invites, info barriers would be if they needed to actually block them.
Maybe C. Saw a similar question in some practice sets and supervision policies came up for monitoring invites, not blocking them though.
I picked C here. Supervision policies sound like they’d watch for users inviting others outside their department, which matches the monitoring vibe. Might not be a full block though, so maybe I’m off. Anyone else think C?
Be respectful. No spam.
