Q: 2
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. Your company has a Microsoft 365 subscription. You need to prevent a user named User1 from permanently deleting private chats in Microsoft Teams. Solution: You place the group mailboxes used by Microsoft Teams on Litigation Hold. Does this meet the goal?
Options
Discussion
Its D, you need to set a custom phone number order at the user level in Teams admin center. This way, Allan’s invites show Toronto then Paris. Pretty sure tenant-wide policies don’t override user customization for this unless specified otherwise. Agree?
Not sure about C here. D matches what I've seen in practice questions, since only a user-level custom number list guarantees the order (Toronto then Paris). C is tempting but misses that detail.
I don’t think it’s D. C for me.
D imo. You have to set a customized audio conferencing number list for Allan to control the order (Toronto first, then Paris). If you skip that, Teams just uses the default and you can't guarantee the sequence. Happened on a similar practice exam.
Probably D for this. You need to use the customized audio conferencing settings at the user level to control the order of dial-in numbers in Teams meeting invites (Toronto first, then Paris). The trap is thinking default bridge order would work but that doesn't let you set a specific sequence.
Are we sure it can't be C? Sometimes default bridge order applies unless there's a policy that forces customization, right?
Got to be D here, since customized order controls how Teams shows those bridge numbers in invites.
Option D
Does the official MS-700 guide mention anything about tenant-wide policies interfering with these user-level audio conferencing settings? I remember seeing something similar but wasn't sure if those policies override the customized number sequence for specific users.
D
Be respectful. No spam.