Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result these questions will not appear in the review screen. A company plans to optimize its permission sets. The company has the following permission sets: 
You need to provide the following implementation for a third permission set: • Create a new Permission Set C that is a composite of Permission Set A and Permission Set B. • Assign Permission Set C to a user. You need to ensure that the user has only read access to the Job table. Solution: Set the Excluded Permission Sets property to Permission Set B. Does the solution meet the goal?
Q: 13
Options
Discussion
Option B Excluding B doesn't take away the indirect insert from A, so 'only read' isn't enforced. Seen this catch people out on practice sets, so I don't think A is right here.
Guessing A
Had almost this exact scenario in a mock, it's B.
Yeah, it's B. Excluding Permission Set B doesn't actually take away the indirect insert from Set A, so the user would still have more than just read access. Pretty sure that's not what you want here, but happy to hear if anyone thinks otherwise.
Nah, it's B. Excluding B doesn't remove indirect insert from A, so only-read isn't guaranteed. The yes option is a classic trap.
Its B. This Excluded Permission Sets trick doesn't wipe out indirect insert from Permission Set A, so 'only read' isn't enforced. You'd still have more access than needed. Happened on similar practice sets before, so pretty sure. Disagree?
C/D? Based on how Excluded Permission Sets works, just excluding B won't strip out everything except Read from A-you'd still get indirect insert. So pretty sure B is right. Anyone see it differently?
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 13 of 25
