Why would someone think D is right here? Channel bonding is all about boosting throughput, not antenna strength or coverage. B matches what 802.11n/ac/ax channel bonding actually accomplishes. If you need extra bandwidth for clients, that's when you'd bond those channels. Correct me if I'm missing a use case?
DRAG DROP Match the most cost-effective option for cabling each requirement. (All lengths indicate total cable length including patch cable(s), service loops, etc. where used.)
100Gb 3M = single mode fiber, 1Gb 100' = Cat 6a, 10Gb 200' = DAC, 1Gb 2km = multimode fiber. I don’t think DAC is valid for the longer run since that’s way past its limit, and single mode at short range is often cheaper at high speeds than multi or fancy copper in enterprise gear. Trap here is thinking DAC for the shortest span (common on CCNA), but that usually maxes at ~10m and gets pricey fast. Pretty sure this lines up with exam practice sets-open to corrections if anyone's actually priced these builds recently.
If the question said "most future-proof" instead of "most cost-effective," would you still pick single mode for the 3M 100Gb link?
DRAG DROP Match the switching technology with the appropriate use case.
These acronyms get tossed around so much but on actual config, it's easy to mix up which one maps where. Pretty sure that's the right order from similar questions in practice sets. If you think otherwise let me know.
DRAG DROP List the WPA 4-Way Handshake functions in the correct order.
DRAG DROP Match the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) layer with its comparable member of the TCP/IP stack. (Options may be used more than once.)
DRAG DROP Match the feature to the Aruba OS version (Matches may be used more than once.)
DRAG DROP Match the phase of message processing with the Open Systems interconnection (OSl) layer.
Not totally sure cause OSI layers always trip me up, but I guessed: Physical Layer - Organizes into segments, Network Layer - frames, Transport Layer - packets, Data Link Layer - bits. Is that right?
DRAG DROP Match the appropriate QoS concept with its definition.






