Q: 9
What are two advantages of a UXl? (Select two.)
Options
Discussion
Agree with C and E here. UXI's main advantages are acting like a client (C) and checking real app performance like HTTP or Office 365 (E). D is more for dedicated coverage tools, not what UXI usually does. Pretty confident but open if I've missed anything.
C vs D, but pretty sure it's C and E. UXI is designed to act like a user client and test apps from the user's perspective, not just check coverage. Unless they specifically mean coverage mapping, I'd stick with C and E for this one.
Looks like C/E fit best, since UXI simulates users and tests app performance.
Maybe C and D, had something like this in a mock and those matched the UXI use cases.
C/E tbh, UXI is about simulating users and app testing not coverage or channel selection.
B , since UXI can help recommend best WiFi channels for optimization and sometimes that's counted as a core benefit. Tempted by C too, but wasn't sure if E was a stretch. Open to corrections if someone has direct Aruba docs.
D , saw this in a mock and picked C and E but not 100% sure, could be D/E too.
Pretty sure the right combo is C and E for this one. UXI devices act as simulated clients (that's what C means) and they test real-world user apps like HTTP or Office 365, per E. D sounds more like a site survey tool, not what UXI is built for. Let me know if you see it differently!
Option C and E. D is tempting, but UXI's main advantage is simulating user experience and testing apps, not just showing coverage.
B and D tbh, saw a similar Aruba question and those were marked as UXI advantages in the practice set.
Be respectful. No spam.
