Looks like B is the right format for most Cisco gear: ip route 10.2.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.1.1. I picked B since it includes the mask and next hop, but not sure if the 'description aruba' at the end should be there for Aruba devices.
Tricky since the mask format isn't specified. If they were expecting traditional subnet mask style for static routes, D would work because ip route-static plus dotted decimal is legit in some HPE contexts. I'm mostly basing this on similar CLI from older HPE/Comware gear. Not 100 percent sure here though, could go either way if more context was given.
D
For me, A fits ArubaOS-CX since it uses the ip-route command with CIDR (/24), which is standard for static routes on these switches. D is more Comware style with the dotted mask, but that's not what they're asking for in this context. Not 100 percent sure if it's universal but for Aruba, A looks right. Anyone disagree?