Q: 12
When would you bond multiple 20MHz wide 802.11 channels?
Options
Discussion
Bonding multiple 20MHz channels is really just for more throughput between AP and client, not antenna gain or redundancy. B fits. Pretty sure about this but open if someone has a different take on how antennas tie in.
B tbh, saw a similar question in some exam reports. Channel bonding boosts throughput by making more bandwidth available between client and AP. Pretty sure that's what they're getting at here.
I don't think it's B. C. Highly available AP groups seem like a solid reason for bonding channels, especially in bigger deployments.
B , channel bonding is all about upping throughput between AP and client. Not 100 percent but seems right here.
D is wrong here, B makes more sense. Channel bonding isn't about antennas but about combining channels for fatter pipes between client and AP, so you get higher throughput. Pretty sure that's the main benefit-open to corrections though.
Why would someone think D is right here? Channel bonding is all about boosting throughput, not antenna strength or coverage. B matches what 802.11n/ac/ax channel bonding actually accomplishes. If you need extra bandwidth for clients, that's when you'd bond those channels. Correct me if I'm missing a use case?
Its B, channel bonding definitely bumps up your throughput because you get more bandwidth between the client and the AP. The other options don't really fit what bonding does. Seen similar logic in other practice sets. I think this is right but open to input if anyone has a different take.
I saw this type of question in the official guide labs. Option D.
Be respectful. No spam.
