1. National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts (NACVA). Business Valuations: Fundamentals, Techniques & Theory (FT&T) Course Materials. In the sections covering Buy-Sell Agreements, the curriculum consistently warns against the use of fixed-price or formula-based approaches due to their failure to reflect fair market value over time. It emphasizes that such agreements are a primary source of valuation-related litigation. The recommended best practice is to specify a process for valuation at the triggering date. (Refer to the module on Buy-Sell Agreements).
2. Pratt, S. P. (2009). Business Valuation and Taxes: Procedure, Law, and Perspective. John Wiley & Sons. In Chapter 11, "Valuations for Buy-Sell Agreements," Pratt explicitly discusses the pitfalls of formulaic approaches, stating, "It is almost a certainty that any fixed price or formula price in a buy-sell agreement will not be representative of the fair market value of the stock at the triggering date..." (p. 235).
3. Hitchner, J. R. (2017). Financial Valuation: Applications and Models. John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 32, "Valuation Issues in Buy-Sell Agreements," details the problems with formula approaches, noting they often fail to consider changes in the company, its industry, or the economy, leading to disputes. The text advocates for using a qualified appraiser to determine value contemporaneously with the triggering event.