Q: 7
An organization wants to ensure its data is protected in the event of a natural disaster. To support this
effort, the company has rented a colocation space in another part of the
country. Which of the following disaster recovery practices can be used to best protect the data?
Options
Discussion
Guessing B for this one
Not B in this case, it's D. The key is the use of a different location for disaster recovery, which matches the definition of off-site. Replication sounds good but isn't directly what they're describing here.
D tbh, because off-site is what you get by renting space in another part of the country. Replication (B) sounds tempting, but just replicating on-prem wouldn’t cut it in a disaster. Off-site protects against regional events. Pretty confident unless I’m missing a detail.
Don’t think it’s B, since replication doesn’t guarantee geographic separation. D is the safe pick for disaster recovery.
D
Had something like this in a mock exam. D fits because off-site protection is about copying data to a different physical location, which is what the colocation setup is for. Replication (B) helps keep data current, but the main point here seems to be geographic separation for disaster recovery. Pretty sure it’s D, but open to corrections if someone sees it differently.
So if the priority is keeping data current, wouldn't B (Replication) be just as valid? Colocation helps, but replication actually keeps copies updated. I might be off, but feels like both are good in real DR planning.
D makes sense here-off-site is all about having backups or systems in a separate location, especially for disaster situations. Saw a similar question in practice sets. Anyone disagree?
D, Off-site fits here, since they're using a separate location for disaster recovery. Pretty sure that's what the question wants.
Is the question asking specifically for storing backups, or does it focus on continuous access to live data? That could change if D or B fits best.
Be respectful. No spam.
