Q: 3
Which of the following communication methods between on-premises and cloud environments
would ensure minimal-to-low latency and overhead?
Options
Discussion
I don’t think D fits here. C is the better pick since direct connection (like AWS Direct Connect or ExpressRoute) means dedicated line, much lower latency and overhead compared to anything internet-based. VPN adds encryption overhead and peering is usually just cloud-to-cloud, not on-prem. Pretty sure it’s C unless they throw in some security requirement.
C tbh
C vs A. Direct connection (C) really does give lowest latency and basically no VPN encryption overhead. Site-to-site VPN (A) is common but the encryption adds a bit of delay. I’m pretty sure C matches what the question wants, unless there’s something about cost I missed.
Its A. Site-to-site VPNs are super common for this use case and I always see them mentioned for hybrid connections, plus the overhead isn't massive. Not 100% but direct connect feels like overkill here. Trap between A and C for sure.
C vs D? Peering looks tempting but that's usually for cloud-to-cloud links, not on-prem to cloud. Pretty sure C is intended here.
C
I’d pick A. Site-to-site VPN is used a lot for these setups, and overhead isn’t always that high in my experience.
Site-to-site VPN (A) looks good if you want something common and secure between on-prem and cloud. Practice tests always mention it, though official guide leans direct connect for latency.
A or D? If a peering link is set up to directly extend on-prem routing into your cloud VPC (some hybrid setups offer that), you could argue D delivers minimal overhead too. But I think the question expects a more traditional setup, so I'm second guessing myself. Anyone else see this as a trick with peering?
Its C here. D is a trap since peering is for cloud-to-cloud, but the question says on-prem to cloud.
Be respectful. No spam.