Q: 1
The effect of testing is to:
Options
Discussion
A , since often testing is meant to raise the overall software quality. Think B's a trap here.
B tbh, testing just gives you a snapshot of quality. It doesn't guarantee software is bug-free or that quality actually goes up.
B, not A
A Pretty sure the official guide and some practice tests highlight testing as a way to boost quality, not just report it.
B
B imo, since testing mainly gives an indication of quality, not a guarantee or direct improvement. A is a common trap because finding bugs helps but doesn’t itself boost quality automatically. Pretty sure ISTQB is clear on this.
A is wrong, B. Had something like this in a mock and it was all about testing giving an indication, not actually improving quality itself. You can’t guarantee zero defects just by testing. Anyone disagree?
A . Official guide and practice questions talk a lot about testing raising quality, especially in early chapters.
Probably B, but does the question specify "only" effect or just the main effect? If they're asking for the single primary impact, then A would be a trap since testing alone doesn’t guarantee quality increases.
Be respectful. No spam.
