Always see A flagged for this in official guide and practice questions. For auditor roles, preserving logs on a separate host is crucial since attackers often wipe local logs first. Without that, you can’t reliably trace incidents after a breach. Pretty sure about A here, but if anyone finds newer ISACA guidance that swaps priorities let me know.
Q: 4
Which of the following is MOST important for an IS auditor to verify when evaluating an
organization's firewall?
Options
Discussion
If the logs are already sent off-device, why wouldn't config file access (D) be just as important for audit trust?
A here, since log integrity is the main thing an IS auditor checks. If logs aren't on a separate protected host, audit trail can be compromised. Pretty sure that's the CISA perspective, but let me know if you see it differently.
Audit focus so that's A.
C/D? CISA stuff always flips my brain, but I'm thinking maybe A is too textbooky this time.
Its D, restricting config file access prevents unauthorized changes so I think that's what matters most. Saw similar in exam reports and config control is always a trap option.
A tbh, audit is all about making sure the logs can't be tampered with, so storing them separately matters most. If attackers get in, local logs might get wiped. Pretty sure that's what ISACA wants here but willing to hear other takes.
Its D, had something like this in a mock. Config file access seems most critical for control.
A . Audit needs logs kept safe from tampering, so separate protected host is key here.
A , saw similar wording before. For auditors, having logs on a separate protected host means reliable evidence even if the firewall is compromised. Config access (D) is key for ops, but audit integrity relies more on untouched logs. Disagree?
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 4 of 35