Q: 1
Which of the following would present the GREATEST concern during a review of internal
audit quality assurance (QA) and continuous improvement processes?
Options
Discussion
A , not having periodic external assessments is a direct violation of mandatory QA standards, bigger flag than just missing some testing (D). Seen similar in CISA guides.
No external assessment is a dealbreaker for standards so A.
A , saw this in a similar practice set and official CISA guide says missing external QA violates standards, which is a huge problem for audit credibility.
D . If you don't do substantive testing during some assessments, you could totally miss key control failures. That feels like a bigger risk to audit quality, even if A is more about compliance.
Pretty sure it's D. If you skip substantive testing during assessment, huge audit findings could slip through. Open to being convinced otherwise.
Similar question was in the official guide and practice test, both point to A as the main concern.
A , not having periodic external assessments is a clear breach of professional audit standards (IIA 1312). D trips people up since missing substantive testing matters, but A is a straight standards violation. Could be wrong, but that's what I saw on similar questions.
I don’t think it’s A. D is a bigger deal in practice, since missing substantive testing during assessments could lead to undetected issues. Pretty sure about this, but if we're talking strict standards, maybe I'm off.
Missing external QA reviews (A) is a direct standards violation, so it's the biggest problem here. Consistency in tracking (C) matters, but not meeting IIA requirements for external review is the real deal-breaker. Pretty sure about this, but happy to hear any counterpoints.
A, No external reviews (A) is a mandatory QAIP failure, bigger concern than D missing testing, at least for CISA. Open to other views if I missed something.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 1 of 35