Does the question want a report focused on individual software products or on the whole software model view? If it’s about products, D might fit but if it’s asking for lifecycle info per model, C makes more sense. Just need to confirm if it’s "best" for lifecycle visibility company-wide.
I think B fits best. In ServiceNow bar charts, you get the most flexibility by using both Group by and Stacked by to break down license metric data into categories and sub-categories. Pretty sure that's what "refine" is getting at, since stacking adds more detail beyond just grouping. Anyone disagree?
I thought it was D since "Group by" is always required in building those bar charts, even if you don't use stacking. Maybe I'm missing something-pretty sure I've just used Group by to refine before. Agree?
Pretty sure it's B. Exploration phase goes deeper, gathering those extra details from the CI, not just classification. D is a bit of a trap since classification happens earlier in the process. If someone thinks otherwise let me know!
HOTSPOT Define the three catalogs that support the request and procurement process.
Wouldn't it matter if you’re dealing with non-standard items? I’ve seen Product Catalog used for internal hardware models, but if procurement is through a vendor’s marketplace integration, some orgs bypass the internal catalog and map requests straight from Vendor Catalog. Does Service Catalog still apply then or does that process skip it?
Doesn't the Service Catalog also include some models, not just the services and items users can request? I always get confused between what lives in Product vs Service Catalog in SAM context. Anyone else?
