Q: 1
During a merger and acquisition, the most comprehensive review of privacy risks and gaps occurs
when conducting what activity?
Options
Discussion
Option C Saw this on a practice exam and due diligence was the right choice.
Its C, but if the org skips formal diligence or doesn't get data access till integration, D could happen in rare cases. Got tripped up by this wording once, so not 100% sure-depends how strictly they mean "comprehensive."
Had something like this in a mock and I picked D. Focused on how privacy gaps sometimes only become clear during integration when systems/processes merge. Pretty sure the exam expects C, but I thought D was a solid pick in that context. Agree?
C vs D? C is the main comprehensive phase per CIPM, D trips people up because some risks show later but it’s not the official deep dive. Think C is safer pick unless question hints otherwise.
C over D here. Due diligence is where you get the full privacy deep dive before any deal is signed, so exam-wise it's the better fit. D can reveal issues but isn't meant for a comprehensive review, just cleanup. Anyone disagree?
C or D-I've seen arguments both ways. Due diligence (C) does a lot of checking, but sometimes deep privacy problems aren't obvious until integration (D) starts. Not 100% sure which way the exam wants here.
Not D here, it's C. Due diligence is when you really dig into all privacy risks and compliance gaps before the deal is final. Integration (D) is about fixing or aligning processes after the fact, not the big review itself. I've seen similar questions in practice tests and C was always correct, but open to other views if someone disagrees.
A is wrong, C. Due diligence is when all the deep privacy checks get done before moving forward.
C That's the phase where you actually dig into all privacy controls and gaps before anything is finalized.
Why not B here? Risk identification review sounds close, but CIPM seems to always treat due diligence (C) as the official step for deep privacy gap analysis in M&A. Still, risk review pops up in frameworks so curious if there's a scenario where it covers more ground than due diligence?
Be respectful. No spam.