Q: 2
An enterprise has had the same IT governance framework in place for several years. Currently, large
and small capital projects go through the same architectural governance reviews. Despite repeated
requests to streamline the review process for small capital projects, business units have received no
response from IT. The business units have recently escalated this issue to the newly appointed GO.
Which of the following should be done FIRST to begin addressing business needs?
Options
Discussion
B shows up a ton in the official guide and recent practice exams for first steps like this. Definitely review that section if you're prepping, it helps lock down these sequencing questions.
B . Usually you want to explain the governance framework up front so everyone is clear on why it exists. A lot of exam reports flag B as a trap but I still think it's a reasonable first move here.
Its B. You need to know where the current gaps are before tweaking classification or valuing assets. Gap analysis gives that initial roadmap, I think that's what ISACA’s looking for first here. Open if someone has a different view.
C/D? I get why B is picked since a gap analysis sets the foundation for everything else, but reviewing classification procedures (C) seems important too early on. Still, I think gap analysis is usually the broader step first. Anyone see C as viable?
B imo. Gap analysis gives you the big picture on what's missing so you can plan the right governance steps after. Not 100% sure, but that's what makes most sense to me here.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 2 of 35