Q: 15
Which of the following should be the PRIMARY consideration when implementing IT governance in a
small, newly established organization?
Options
Discussion
Wouldn't KPIs (D) be enough for the board? Balanced scorecard always feels too broad for just IT performance.
D, You need to know who owns each responsibility before you can set anything else up.
In a small org just starting out, you really need to clarify who does what before anything else. D is the practical move, since roles and responsibilities are the backbone for accountability and future decisions. Could maybe see confusion with C if it was about mature frameworks, but here it's all about that structure first.
A is wrong, D. Roles and responsibilities have to come first for any governance to work.
Maybe D makes the most sense here since a small org needs some basic accountability first. Without clear IT roles and responsibilities, you can't really assign budgets or set up methodology. Not 100 percent sure though, but I think that's what ISACA wants.
C or B. In a small new org, you often want to set some basic architecture or methodology early so things don’t get messy as you scale. I’ve seen similar questions in official practice tests and they usually highlight putting structure (like project management methods) in place early. The ISACA official guide covers this.
Always with these buzzword questions... Probably A since the balanced scorecard is what execs like for high-level IT performance.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 15 of 35