D, Only this option uses SSE-KMS with S3 for solid encryption and IAM for access control, plus CloudWatch for actual performance monitoring. The others leave out something important or use the wrong monitoring tool. I think D fits the requirements best, but open if someone sees a catch.
Q: 6
Scenario: A fraud detection model workflow must ensure that all data is encrypted in transit and at
rest, access to sensitive data and models is strictly controlled, and the system allows for continuous
monitoring of model performance.
Question- Which solution will secure the ML workflow, control access, and allow for continuous
monitoring of model performance?
Options:
Options
Discussion
D hits all the requirements: SSE-KMS for encryption at rest, IAM for strict access, and CloudWatch monitoring covers continuous model checks. The others skip something critical like strong encryption or real model metrics. Pretty sure D is it, but let me know if I missed a flaw.
Not B, D fits best here. S3 SSE-KMS ensures strong encryption at rest, and IAM roles cover tight access controls for both data and the model. CloudWatch is built for monitoring model metrics like latency, which matches the scenario's need for ongoing performance checks. Pretty sure this covers all three requirements better than the others, but correct me if I missed something.
Option D, B is a trap since Macie is for data classification, not ongoing model monitoring.
It’s D since SSE-KMS covers strong encryption at rest, IAM handles strict access, and CloudWatch is right for model performance monitoring. Pretty sure the other options miss either access control or monitoring details.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 6 of 15