Q: 5
Scenario: A financial organization needs to migrate a custom, real-time fraud detection model
(less than 5 GB, up to 50 concurrent requests) from on-premises infrastructure to AWS,
prioritizing minimal infrastructure management.
Question- Which solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead?..
Options:
Options
Discussion
D , since SageMaker serverless gets rid of almost all infra management headaches. For this traffic level (50 concurrent) and model size, no need to mess with EC2, ASG or even regular SageMaker endpoints. Serverless takes care of scaling and you only pay for what you use. Pretty sure that's the point of the question but happy to hear another angle.
C vs A. I think C because EC2 with load balancer covers scaling and high availability, seems simple enough without too much management. SageMaker options feel like overkill for just 50 requests. Could be wrong though.
C or A for me. EC2 in an auto-scaling group (C) lets you keep control and scale up with more requests, plus you can throw a load balancer in for high availability. A also sounds good since SageMaker Neo optimizes models, then you use SageMaker endpoints for real-time inference, which is supposed to be low maintenance. Not totally sure which the exam wants, but I'd bet one of those covers the basics.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 5 of 15