Scenario: An image classifier misclassifies images, and analysis shows the model is highly sensitive to image orientation (e.g., upside-down pandas). The team needs to enhance the model's ability to identify the objects regardless of orientation without collecting a new dataset. Question- Which approach most effectively enhances the model’s accuracy in addressing this specific misclassification issue?. Options:
Q: 15
Options
Discussion
Makes sense to go with A here. Flipping and rotation using augmentation are exactly what fix the orientation sensitivity, so no need for more data collection. Pretty straightforward in this case I think-A.
Option D
Had something like this in a mock, and A was the best fix. Rotation and flipping through data augmentation directly handle orientation sensitivity, especially since collecting new images isn't allowed. Let me know if anyone found B or D worked better elsewhere.
Its A. The trap here is D, but without new data limitation, augmentation like rotation/flip is exactly what fixes orientation issues.
For me, A, since augmentation lets you add rotated and flipped versions without collecting new images.
A stands out here. Data augmentation like rotation and flipping tackles the orientation problem right away, which is exactly what they're asking about. I've seen a very similar question in practice tests and it was always A. Pretty sure that's what AWS expects. Disagree?
A official AWS ML guide and hands-on labs usually cover this kind of augmentation trick for orientation problems.
C/D? Scaling and normalization usually help with overall accuracy, so I'm unsure if just augmenting would be enough in all cases.
A imo. Official guide and practice tests usually mention data augmentation for orientation issues like this, especially when you're not allowed to gather new data. Anyone see something different in labs or other study material?
Similar question came up in the official guide, pretty sure D would get you close here.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 15 of 15