Had something like this in a mock. For real LCNC, D's the only one that gives both JumpStart and Autopilot together, so you barely need to touch code and the process is automated. The other options involve more manual work or require scripts. Pretty confident with D here but open if anyone's seen AWS change that recently.
Q: 13
Scenario: A team needs to fine-tune an LLM for text summarization using a low- code/no-code
(LCNC) solution to automate model training and minimize manual intervention.
Question- Which solution will best meet the team’s requirements?.
Options:
Options
Discussion
Its D, pretty sure. Official guide and practice questions both highlight Autopilot plus JumpStart for LCNC AWS cases.
Nah, B looks tempting but it's D. Studio alone needs manual setup, Autopilot plus JumpStart is truly low-code/no-code. Trap for Studio fans!
Probably D, since JumpStart plus Autopilot is the only option here that's really LCNC for LLM fine-tuning.
Not B, D. The question wants real low-code/no-code and Studio on its own still needs more manual setup than Autopilot+JumpStart. B is a bit of a trap since the environment is user-friendly but not fully automated LCNC. D fits what AWS advertises for quick LLM fine-tuning without much manual work.
Option D. seen similar in exam reports. Fits LCNC with minimal effort and automation.
Its D here. Only SageMaker Autopilot with JumpStart actually fits the low-code/no-code need, since you get a GUI and automated setup instead of dealing with raw scripts or APIs. Pretty sure about this one unless AWS changed something recently.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 13 of 15