Q: 15
An engineer must create data-link redundancy for the company’s Cisco Wireless LAN Controller. The
engineer has decided to configure LAG-based redundancy instead of port-based redundancy. Which
three features of LAG-based redundancy influenced this decision? (Choose three.)
Options
Discussion
Sounds like the benefits they want are consistency in port usage, redundancy as long as one port stays up, and grouping ports together. So A, B, and F make sense here. These match LAG features for WLC, pretty sure about this from config guides. If anyone thinks D fits, let me know.
Hard to say, C. In my notes, LAG might use multiple untagged dynamic interfaces per port so I figured C applies here.
B, not D. LAG on Cisco WLCs sticks to a single switch (or stack), so options A, B, and F fit what you get from LAG redundancy. I'd double-check with the official guide or some lab practice though since the wording is always tricky.
A B, F. D is about connecting to two switches, but LAG on WLC doesn't support that unless it's a stack. Saw similar wording in other practice sets, pretty sure these are correct.
Pretty sure it's A, B, F for LAG redundancy on WLCs.
Be respectful. No spam.
