Q: 2
What is one business risk introduced by the use of legacy firewalls?
Options
Discussion
A . B is tempting but not really a direct business risk, performance hits actually affect productivity. Anyone see it differently?
Probably A, seen similar in practice questions. D is a trap since low licensing support isn't really a business risk.
Performance issues (A) stand out since slowdowns from legacy firewalls can directly hurt user productivity and cloud access. The other options don't really tie back to business impact as much. Pretty sure it's A but open to corrections.
Option A
A or D? But since the question says "business risk" and not just technical gaps, A (performance issues) fits better. Performance hits can directly impact productivity, especially with legacy firewalls hairpinning cloud traffic. If they asked about feature limitations I'd maybe lean D, but for risk to ops it's gotta be A I think. Disagree?
B , I see reduced management as a big issue with old firewalls because you lose out on newer automation and cloud controls. Not totally sure though, maybe A is more direct for business risk. Disagree?
Its A. Performance issues are a big risk because legacy firewalls can create network bottlenecks, especially as more business traffic moves to the cloud. D sounds tempting but low licensing support isn’t really a business-level risk compared to actual slowdowns for users and apps. Pretty sure that's what they want here, but open to other views if I've missed something.
I don’t think it’s A. D
Legacy firewalls bottleneck traffic which can seriously slow down business apps, especially for cloud stuff. So A makes sense as the real risk, not things like reduced management or licensing. If these were managed differently or in a tiny network, maybe it changes but in most enterprise setups, I think it's definitely A. Anyone see a context where B or D could matter more?
Its D, had something like this in a mock and picked licensing support there.
Be respectful. No spam.