Q: 12
As technology that exists for a very long period of time, has URL Filtering lost its effectiveness?
Options
Discussion
Option A is right. URL filtering still matters a lot, especially as a first layer before heavier checks like sandboxing. Even with HTTPS, if you use SSL inspection, URL filtering works fine. Saw similar questions on practice tests.
D , since most traffic is encrypted now with HTTPS, basic URL filtering won't see inside unless the org does SSL inspection. Seems kinda outdated for a "cloud-first" model. Pretty sure that's what they're getting at here, but open to other takes.
D imo. If the org doesn’t use SSL inspection, URL Filtering can’t see inside most traffic so kinda useless.
Still A. URL filtering is definitely not outdated and is used as the first layer even with SSL/TLS traffic.
Maybe D. With so much traffic using HTTPS now, URL filtering can't inspect the actual content unless SSL inspection is enabled. I think that makes it far less useful compared to before, so leaning toward D here. Anyone disagree?
Option D. since most web traffic is encrypted these days, URL filtering doesn't really cut it anymore from what I've seen.
A lot depends on whether SSL/TLS inspection is actually implemented. If it's not, then a lot of HTTPS traffic can't be categorized properly and URL filtering effectiveness really drops. But if SSL inspection is on, filtering still works like before. So does the question assume SSL inspection is being used or not?
Had something like this in a mock. URL filtering is still widely used as the first defense, especially with SSL inspection handling HTTPS. Picking A.
Not quite that simple, URL filtering still works even with HTTPS if you have SSL inspection set up. A
Be respectful. No spam.