Q: 7
Which of the following is best used to detect fraud by assigning employees to different roles?
Options
Discussion
Option D fits best, seen similar in official practice sets. Job rotation puts new people in roles so hidden fraud is more likely to get found. Not totally sure if some guides split hairs, but the study guide leans D here.
D imo
D imo. Job rotation is meant to uncover issues like fraud by moving people into new roles, so someone fresh might spot something off. Separation of duties (C) is more about preventing a single person from having too much access, but detection happens when roles change. Pretty sure it's D here, but open to other ideas if I'm missing something.
Small wording changes flip this, "detect" points to D here.
D , saw a similar question in a practice test and job rotation was picked.
C or D here. Separation of duties also helps prevent fraud by splitting responsibilities, so sometimes it gets confused with job rotation. I think C fits since it stops someone from having all access, but not 100% sure.
Practice tests and the official study guide both call out D as the correct detective control in this scenario. D
I don't think it's C here. That one's more about blocking fraud up front, but job rotation (D) actually lets you find it since someone new checks the role. Exam practice and NIST guides both point to D for detection.
C tbh, since separation of duties stops one person from having too much control which helps catch fraud, not just prevent it. But tricky since D is tempting.
D . Job rotation gives you that fresh set of eyes on processes so stuff like fraud is more likely to be spotted by the new person. Separation of duties (C) is great for preventing fraud, but for actually discovering it after the fact, D is usually what they want. Pretty sure that's what the exam expects here.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 7 of 35