Q: 5
Which Subsidiary Restriction type limits a role’s access to a selected subsidiary on their Employee
record?
Options
Discussion
D . C is tempting since it sounds broader, but 'Selected' actually keys off the specific employee record, which matches the question. Seen this come up in practice exams so pretty sure. Let me know if you have a different read.
Yeah, it's D. Only 'Selected' restriction matches up with the subsidiary picked on the employee record, so it narrows down role access specifically to that. The others are either too broad or not tied directly to the employee. Pretty confident but open if someone has seen something different.
C , since "Subsidiary" sounds like it covers the basic restriction and would limit access by subsidiary, but maybe it's not specific enough for the employee record angle. Open to correction if I'm missing a detail here.
D tbh, 'Selected' uses what's on the employee record for subsidiary restrictions. Pretty specific to that setup, not generic like the others. If anyone's seen this used a different way let me know.
Probably D, since only 'Selected' respect the employee record's subsidiary field for the role restriction. Seen similar on recent practice.
D imo, but employee roles can confuse me sometimes.
D not C. The 'Selected' restriction is tied to the employee record, C is easy to mix up but isn't correct.
Pretty sure D, not A. The 'Selected' restriction type specifically ties the role's access to whatever subsidiary is set on their Employee record. That's the distinction vs the more general choices.
Option D for this one. The 'Selected' restriction is tied directly to what's listed on the employee record, while the others are broader or less specific. That's how I've seen it handled in SuiteFoundation practice sets, but I'm not 100% sure if Oracle might have tweaked naming in updates.
Be respectful. No spam.
