Yeah, D fits best. Only Admin1, Admin2, and Admin3 need that Sensitivity Label Administrator role for label creation. Keeps to least privilege so you're not handing out extra access. If the scope changes or more admins actually create labels, then maybe revisit. Agree?
Q: 20
You need to meet the technical requirements for the creation of the sensitivity labels.
To which user or users must you assign the Sensitivity Label Administrator role?
Options
Discussion
Probably D. Had something like this in a mock and it was only Admin1, Admin2, and Admin3 who were supposed to manage sensitivity labels. Keeps least privilege tight. Pretty sure about this but could be wrong if the scenario changed.
C/D? But pretty sure D is right. Only Admin1, Admin2, and Admin3 need the Sensitivity Label Administrator role for label creation. C leaves out someone necessary and E throws in extra admins you don't want for least privilege.
D is the one here. Only Admin1, Admin2, and Admin3 should get the Sensitivity Label Administrator role since the task is just label creation. Option E adds folks who don't need it, which goes against least privilege. If I'm missing something about Admin4/Admin5's roles let me know.
D . Only Admin1, Admin2, and Admin3 get the Sensitivity Label Administrator role if the task is label creation specifically. Keeps least privilege intact, no reason to add Admin4 or Admin5 if they're not handling sensitivity labels themselves. Pretty sure this matches how Microsoft expects you to delegate these roles.
Maybe E. With info protection, you'd want all admins who might need to manage or troubleshoot labels to have the role, not just the main three. Not fully sure, but most likely E unless they're locked out for least privilege?
C or D here, but I think D makes more sense. Only Admin1, Admin2, and Admin3 should get the Sensitivity Label Administrator role if we're just focusing on creation. Option B is tempting but adds an extra user who doesn't need it. Open to counterpoints though.
Probably B, since Admin1 and Admin4 both sound involved with label management. Anyone else thinking this?
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 20 of 25