Q: 7
Your company is developing a new Azure App Service web app. You are providing design assistance
to verify the security of the web app.
You need to recommend a solution to test the web app for vulnerabilities such as insecure server
configurations, cross-site scripting (XSS), and SQL injection. What should you include in the
recommendation?
Options
Discussion
D for sure. DAST actively scans the running app so it finds things like XSS and SQLi, which static analysis (B) would probably miss since it doesn't test in real time. Only thing giving me pause is if IAST (A) would ever be enough, but I think D fits this scenario better.
Probably D, saw similar in practice sets where DAST caught those web app vulns.
Pretty sure it's D. DAST checks for runtime vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection in running web apps.
D or maybe A? Pretty sure DAST (D) is best for finding XSS and SQL injection since it tests the app in a running state, like an external attacker would. Option A is more focused on combining static and dynamic but isn't as direct for runtime config issues. Anyone see IAST being preferred here?
D imo. . Had something like this in a mock and DAST is the one that actually checks for issues like XSS and SQLi while the app's running.
Be respectful. No spam.