Q: 4
A solutions architect works for a government agency that has strict disaster recovery requirements.
All Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) snapshots are required to be saved in at least two
additional AWS Regions. The agency also is required to maintain the lowest possible operational
overhead.
Which solution meets these requirements?
Options
Discussion
A . DLM is designed to automate EBS snapshot lifecycle including cross-region copy, keeping ops overhead super low. B needs managing Lambda code which adds toil, and C/S3 can't directly do EBS snapshots. D's more for AMIs.
Probably A, since Amazon DLM can automate cross-region EBS snapshot copies with almost zero manual overhead. Saw a similar question in some practice tests and DLM fits disaster recovery best here. Anyone see it differently?
B
B not A. Scheduling Lambda to copy snapshots seems valid and is also pretty automated. Trap is missing extra steps for full managed service.
Wouldn’t B make sense too? Lambda plus EventBridge automates it, just a bit more config than A.
I’d say A, DLM keeps ops overhead super low and fits the cross-region EBS snapshot piece for compliance.
A seen similar wording in practice questions and official docs. DLM cross-region policies keep ops overhead super low compared to Lambda or manual scripting. Official AWS guide and exam guide both call this out.
Its B for me, since Lambda with EventBridge seems direct for automating this even if it means a bit more to manage. A feels like the "set-and-forget" trap option here honestly. Anyone else pick B after reading?
EventBridge with Lambda is the way I see it, so B here. Lambda can automate copying snapshots cross-region, seems practical to me.
B or A, but I was thinking B since using Lambda with EventBridge could automate the snapshot copying to multiple regions. It feels flexible, though now I wonder if that's actually more ops overhead than DLM. Not 100% sure, anyone see a reason Lambda would be better here?
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 4 of 35