For this, I'd lean B. Official practice tests and docs say DataSync plus Glacier Deep Archive is usually the most cost-effective for archive with week-long retrieval needs. Only thing that makes me pause is if Tape Gateway (D) is really needed for legal or process reasons, but I don't see that here. Anyone got different experience from labs?
Q: 3
A company has an application that analyzes and stores image data on premises The application
receives millions of new image files every day Files are an average of 1 MB in size The files are
analyzed in batches of 1 GB When the application analyzes a batch the application zips the
imagestogether The application then archives the images as a single file in an on-premises NFS
server for long-term storage
The company has a Microsoft Hyper-V environment on premises and has compute capacity available
The company does not have storage capacity and wants to archive the images on AWS The company
needs the ability to retrieve archived data within t week of a request.
The company has a 10 Gbps AWS Direct Connect connection between its on-premises data center
and AWS. The company needs to set bandwidth limits and schedule archived images to be copied to
AWS dunng non-business hours.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Options
Discussion
Option B
C/D? Tape Gateway always throws me off, but the lifecycle policy in C looks tempting for cost.
Its C, not B. S3 Standard first then Glacier Deep Archive is less of a hassle to restore batches, I think.
I don’t think it’s D. B is right since Tape Gateway is overkill when you don’t have physical tapes, and C adds unnecessary S3 Standard cost before lifecycle kicks in.
Nah, I don't think it's D here. B is better since Tape Gateway's for legacy tape use, but nothing in the scenario needs that.
This looks like one from my exam last year in practice sets, B is what the official guide and exam walkthroughs recommend for cost-effective archiving with DataSync and Deep Archive.
C/D? Lifecycle to Deep Archive is tempting, but Tape Gateway feels like a trap since no tape needs are given.
Wish AWS would make these archiving Qs less repetitive. Pick's B, since DataSync on Hyper-V to S3 Glacier Deep Archive cuts costs and lets you schedule/bandwidth limit, which matches requirements. Tape Gateway isn’t needed here, I think.
B , because DataSync as a Hyper-V VM directly to Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost answer for this scenario. D trips people up but Tape Gateway is only needed if you have tape workflows, which isn't mentioned here. Open to arguments though if I'm missing a nuance.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 3 of 35