This question's wording is clear, thanks! I think A and B make sense since the Direct Connect gateway lets you reach VPCs in other regions using one connection, helping keep costs down. B points specifically to connecting those extra VPCs through the gateway. Not totally sure if that's enough for access to public AWS services though, so open to corrections.
Q: 20
A company is building a hybrid environment that includes servers in an on-premises data center and
in the AWS Cloud. The company has deployed Amazon EC2 instances in three VPCs. Each VPC is in a
different AWS Region. The company has established an AWS Direct Connect connection to the data
center from the Region that is closest to the data center.
The company needs the servers in the on-premises data center to have access to the EC2 instances in
all three VPCs. The servers in the on-premises data center also must have access to AWS public
services.
Which combination of steps will meet these requirements with the LEAST cost? (Select TWO.)
Options
Discussion
A or E. If on-premises needs both private VPC and AWS public services, pretty sure public VIF (E) is essential, not just VPC peering or extra connections. Unless their public service traffic flows some other way?
A and E tbh. A handles access to all the VPCs with just one Direct Connect gateway, so no need for extra connections. E gives you the public VIF, which is required for accessing AWS public services from on-prem. Cheaper than setting up multiple links. Happy to hear other views if I missed something.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 20 of 35