Q: 5
Which basic Agile quality practice reduces bottlenecks and ensures consistency?
Options
Discussion
B. no doubt. Covers both bottlenecks and consistency for Agile teams.
B . Peer-review (D) helps bottlenecks, but "standards" in B really nails consistency, which is what the question asks.
Its B, that's what most official guides and practice tests point to for Agile basics on quality and reducing bottlenecks.
I don’t think it’s A. B is correct, since definition of done is more about deliverable completeness, but collective ownership and standards reduce bottlenecks. Saw a similar question on practice exams.
Maybe D. Peer-review and pairing are classic Agile practices for catching issues early, and I've seen several practice tests pair these actions with reducing bottlenecks. Official SAFe material emphasizes teamwork and standards, but peer-review is the more hands-on quality check. Not 100% sure, so probably worth double-checking in the official guide or a good exam simulator.
Option D
Its D. Seen similar in practice exams but always check the official guide for key Agile quality practices.
C/D? Flow is all about bottlenecks but B matches consistency better. Not super sure on this one.
Hard to say, D, since peer-review and pairing definitely help with bottlenecks in Agile teams.
B , since "standards" is key for consistency, which flips it from peer-review (D) if only asking about bottlenecks.
Be respectful. No spam.
