Makes sense to go with C for this. The question wants the price impacting attributes to work only for one product, not for all products in the class. If you edited at the attribute or class level (A or B), every product using that class would get the change, which might mess up other pricing scenarios. Unless there’s some custom logic overriding this, C matches what the platform supports. Always worth checking if attribute inheritance is customized though!
Q: 7
A product administrator creates a product by associating it with a product class that has three
attributes assigned. Two of these attributes are to be used for attribute-based pricing only for this
product.
How should the product administrator ensure that these two attributes can be used for attribute-
based pricing?
Options
Discussion
C . Attribute override at product level is the only way to affect just that specific product, not all in the class.
Makes sense to go with C here.
C imo, that's what the official guide says for limiting attribute-based pricing to just one product.
C . Editing the inherited attributes at the product level means you can mark those two as price impacting just for this product, not all products in the class. A and B would change things for every product using that class, which isn't needed here.
Probably C. That's the only way to flag price-impacting for just this product without changing all products in the class.
Its C
C/D? Had something like this in a mock, picked C but still not fully sure.
Probably C for this since it's about just one product, not the whole class.
I don’t think B is right here. C matches since you only want the price impact for this one product, not all products tied to the class. B would trigger it everywhere, that’s the trap.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 7 of 25