My pick: A here. The trick is that Revenue Cloud expects assets for lifecycle mgmt, so you have to use the Create or Update Asset From Order Item Action API. B looks tempting but doesn’t use the right API, and C skips the key step of making order line items first. Pretty sure it’s A based on similar exam practice-feel free to push back if you see it differently.
Q: 5
A customer needs to migrate existing active subscriptions from Salesforce CPQ to Revenue Cloud.
What should the customer do to accomplish this?
Options
Discussion
Makes sense to pick A. Migrating active subscriptions means you have to get them into order lines, then use the Create or Update Asset From Order Item Action API. I think that's the only way Revenue Cloud tracks the assets correctly for future amendments and renewals.
A. B is tempting but doesn't handle assetization for Revenue Cloud, pretty sure A fits Salesforce's standard migration path. Disagree?
A. saw similar wording in an exam report and it lined up with the assetization process using the Create or Update Asset From Order Item Action API. Has to be A!
B , but I might be missing a nuance in the API names.
If subscriptions have open amendments, you need to use C.
I thought B was fine for this, since creating assets usually follows converting to orders in migrations.
Option A is right. Using the Create or Update Asset From Order Item API is the standard path, since it handles assetization directly for Revenue Cloud. B sounds tempting but misses the asset focus needed for future amendments.
C or A, not sure which fits better since it depends on whether amendments need tracking.
A imo, saw a similar scenario in practice and the Order Item to Asset API is the standard approach Salesforce expects for this migration. The other options skip core steps or use the wrong API.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 5 of 25