I think A makes more sense here because using a record-triggered flow lets you actively find and assign the latest contract even after creation. It feels safer in case the asset-contract relationship changes later. Not 100 percent sure, though, since context mapping is common too. Agree?
Q: 2
A Revenue Cloud Consultant needs to identify and capture the latest active Contract to which an
Asset belongs.
Which build steps should the consultant take to meet their goal?
Options
Discussion
B makes more sense since context definition tags are the standard way to link contract data between Order and Asset in Revenue Cloud. It’s declarative and matches what Salesforce expects. Pretty sure this is what they'd look for on the exam, agree?
B but if they need to update after asset creation maybe C fits better? Not totally sure here.
B since that's how context tags work in Revenue Cloud for linking Order and Asset on creation. Mapping ContractId in the context definition is the recommended approach. Not 100 percent if ongoing changes are a factor, but this fits standard use. Disagree?
C here. I thought automation on Asset update would catch the latest Contract every time something changes.
B tbh, similar question came up in my practice and mapping tags via context definition is spot on here.
B that's the declarative way and what Salesforce expects for Revenue Cloud asset/contract linkage.
Feels like B. Tag mapping in context definitions is what Salesforce recommends for this. Less code, more maintainable.
Its B. Official guide shows using context definition tags for this kind of mapping and I’ve seen a similar step in some exam reports. Pretty sure A and C are more like custom workarounds.
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 2 of 25