Q: 9
What are the two goals of micro BFD sessions? (Choose two.)
Options
Discussion
Yeah, for goals it's gotta be C and E. Micro BFD is there to verify continuity on every member link, not just one, so "each" in E is key. D sounds ok at first glance but "any" isn't as strong. Pretty sure about this-someone disagree?
Call it C and D. Micro BFD is meant to check member links in a LAG, so D makes sense for "any member link" running BFD. Not 100% sure though, since E sounds close too. Anyone see it differently?
C or D? D checks for any member, but C is a common trap here.
C or D for me. I picked D since it says "any member link" must run BFD, which sounds pretty close to the micro BFD goal of detecting failures per link. But now that I see C is about verifying continuity per member, that makes sense too. Not 100% sure if D overlaps with E though. Open to other views.
Its C and E
Probably C and E. The key goal is verifying continuity for each LAG member link, not just one (D is a bit of a trap because "any" isn't strict enough). Pretty sure that's what Cisco means, but open to debate.
C and E tbh, that's what micro BFD is about: verifying continuity on each LAG member link. D is tempting but only matches the minimum requirement, not the overall goal. Correct me if I missed anything here.
C and E for me. The goal with micro BFD is to make sure every single member link in the LAG is monitored for continuity, not just one or any member. D only requires BFD on a single link, but that's not what Cisco's after for full coverage. If I'm off, let me know!
C vs E. Both talk about continuity and making sure every member link in the LAG is checked, which lines up with what micro BFD is for. D just says "any" link, but pretty sure the goal is to verify all of them. Not 100% but I’d lean C and E for actual exam wording.
I was thinking A and D work here. Micro BFD sessions focus more on member links participating, right?
Be respectful. No spam.
