Q: 3
In a hybrid project, the project manager has identified a few stakeholders. According to the
stakeholder matrix, the head of development has a high rating of power/influence and a high
likelihood of conflict.
Which action should the project manager avoid?
Options
Discussion
D . Dismissing a stakeholder with high power and high conflict risk is just asking for trouble, that can derail your whole project. Pretty sure PMI says you need to engage and address their concerns, not ignore them. Anyone disagree?
D . Official guide covers this type of scenario and says not to dismiss high influence stakeholders.
I think C makes sense here. Giving special attention might create bias in the team and cause more issues.
D , dismissing someone with high influence will only make conflicts worse and mess with stakeholder engagement. PMI always wants you to involve those people, not ignore them. Not 100% but D fits the scenario best.
A is wrong, D. If you dismiss someone with both high influence and a strong possibility for conflict, it's just going to escalate problems and undermine your authority as PM. PMI's all about engaging these sorts of stakeholders directly, not pushing them aside-even if it's tempting.
A is wrong, D. Ignoring a stakeholder with high power/influence is just not something PMI would support, especially if there's risk of conflict. That'd almost guarantee more issues down the line. I think D is the one you absolutely have to avoid here.
D imo. You can't just ignore someone with high power and likely conflict, that's a fast track to project headaches. PMI always pushes for engaging key stakeholders, not brushing them off. Pretty sure that's the trap answer here.
Pretty sure I ran into a similar one in exam, in a mock, always picked D. Ignoring powerful stakeholders just brings way more issues.
No way it's anything but D here
B tbh
Be respectful. No spam.
Question 3 of 35