Q: 4
Wanderlust's CIO asks you to evaluate the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework. At Wanderlust
GmbH a non-SAP EA tool is used, How would you proceed with the request and why? Note: There are
2 correct answers to this question.
Options
Discussion
C or D, but honestly D makes more sense with the scenario. SAP reference architecture content (D) is usable no matter what EA tool you have. Pretty sure B and D are the right combo, unless I'm missing something specific about the company context. Disagree?
B tbh, since A is a trap. SAP EAF isn't tool-locked.
B tbh, seen similar in practice sets.
B and D tbh, fits with EAF being tool-agnostic.
Makes sense to pick B and D. SAP EAF is tool-agnostic so you’d still look at methodology (B) and reference architectures for scoping (D). Official guide and the practice tests cover this approach, I think. Disagree?
B and D. Saw a similar question pop up in recent exam reports, the idea is SAP EAF works regardless of the EA tool, so you compare methodologies (B) and leverage SAP reference content (D). Pretty sure that's what they want here.
SAP writing these like they want us to overthink. B and D.
Option A I remember seeing something similar in exam reports. Since Wanderlust uses a non-SAP EA tool, it kind of makes sense to say SAP EAF isn't necessary here, right? If the company's already invested in another tool, continuing with that could avoid extra training or integration work. I think this is valid unless they're specifically seeking SAP features. Anyone see it differently?
B and D imo, A is the trick option here since SAP EAF works with any tool.
B , but D only fits if the question isn't tool-dependent or asks about reference content.
Be respectful. No spam.
