Q: 2
Your company adapts SAP's Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) as an Integration
Solution Playbook. In your role as Lead Enterprise Architect, you are asked to decide which
integration approach to take for this solution. Which of the following approaches is recommended by
SAP ISA-M for identifying an integration solution and strategy?
Options
Discussion
C . ISA-M always stresses patterns and use-cases before picking tech, so going with C here. A is tempting but jumps into technology too early, which SAP says to avoid.
Option C
C , saw similar question in another exam report and it matched ISA-M steps exactly.
B not C
C imo. ISA-M wants use-case patterns identified before mapping them to tech, not the other way round. Seen this in SAP docs.
Yeah, C is the one that lines up with ISA-M. It has a clear flow: look at current integrations, scope where to focus, then map use-case patterns before jumping to tech choices. SAP always pushes that pattern-based approach first. Not 100% sure but this matches all the docs I remember. Disagree?
Yeah, C is right. ISA-M says to focus on use-case patterns before tech. That’s how SAP frames the methodology afaik.
C no doubt.
Why do people lean toward B here? The ISA-M method is big on mapping use-case patterns to tech, which only C really covers. Isn't that a key part of SAP's recommended approach?
Maybe B on this one. It covers assessing current integrations and reuse, which feels pretty practical as a first step before mapping use cases. Not 100 percent sure though, C could be it too.
Be respectful. No spam.